Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study.
总观点：在校大学生不用选修基本科学课程 分论点1：大学应该是一个人们专修适合自己性格和特长专业的地方 论述：举反例论证若大学生一年都学科学课程所带来的弊端 分论点2：人们不能低估兴趣的影响，特别是在大学阶段 论述：从逼迫学生学习自己不敢兴趣课程的弊端和科学专业学生本身根本不用学习科学基础课程两个反面来进行论述 分论点3：额外的课程会收取额外的费用并且需要额外教学资源的投入 论述：给出两个合理的解决方案。学校可以选择出高价请新的教师或者抽调现有的部分教师来上课。 结论：大学本身应该更注重专业课程的提升而不是一些基础课程
As the so-called cradle of knowledge and talents, universities are often placed with too much expectation as if they can reshape a student into a person with omniscience after years of university study. Facts always go against the grain however. Then we can hear almost the same voice from the media, “we need a more comprehensive course structure to cover every spot of how the world functions”. Yet with a second thought, does the word really make sense, or does the society really expect university graduates to be in that way? Hopefully not. Therefore, I am fully against the idea of introducing basic science into university course system and advocate a more practical sense to view university education. First of all, a reasonable definition of university is a place where people can get professional knowledge in the field they choose. For the first day a student entering into the university, s/he embraces the dream to become a specialist in a specific area. With that goal rooted in mind, s/he selects major related courses, attends useful seminars or wo 登录查看全部范文>>
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that the whole societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
(A卷)Some people think that it is an important part of a child’s education to go on field trips (for example, museums), other people think a child’s time is better spent learning in a classroom at school. What is your opinion?