雅思真题写作范文

真题范文深度剖析（剑桥雅思真题风格）
题目：
Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

高分范文示例与结构分析：

Introduction (引言段)
The debate between personal passion and pragmatic career preparation in higher education is a persistent one. While some advocate for complete academic freedom, others insist on a utilitarian approach focused on STEM fields. This essay will examine both perspectives before arguing that a balanced curriculum which incorporates both elements is most desirable.

结构精要： 首句背景引入，次句用 While 对比陈述双方观点，末句明确陈述文章将采取的结构和核心立场（a balanced curriculum）。

Body Paragraph 1 (主体段1：讨论观点一)
Proponents of unrestricted choice contend that intrinsic motivation is the key to deep learning and innovation. When students pursue subjects they are genuinely passionate about, they are more likely to excel, engage in independent research, and demonstrate creativity. For instance, many groundbreaking artists, philosophers, or social reformers emerged from following their intellectual curiosity rather than a prescribed career path. Therefore, imposing a narrow, practical curriculum could stifle talent and limit the diversity of thought essential for societal progress.

论证逻辑： 主题句 → 原因解释（intrinsic motivation）→ 具体举例（artists, philosophers）→ 反向推论（could stifle talent）。逻辑链条完整。

Body Paragraph 2 (主体段2：讨论观点二)
Conversely, those emphasizing utility argue that universities have a duty to equip graduates with skills directly relevant to the modern economy. They point to the high demand for professionals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, which drive technological advancement and economic growth. Prioritizing these fields, it is believed, ensures individual employability and national competitiveness. Public investment in education, they add, should yield tangible returns by addressing skills shortages in critical sectors.

论证逻辑： 主题句（duty to equip）→ 社会需求论证（high demand for STEM）→ 推论对个人和国家的好处 → 从公共投资角度补充论证。论证角度多元。

Body Paragraph 3 (主体段3：提出个人观点)
In my view, a dichotomy between interest and utility is overly simplistic. An ideal higher education system should allow for specialization in areas with clear career pathways while also mandating a breadth of exposure. For example, an engineering student might benefit from courses in ethics or communication, enhancing their professional versatility. Similarly, a humanities student could acquire basic data literacy, a skill increasingly valuable across sectors. Ultimately, the goal should be to cultivate adaptable individuals who can apply critical thinking—a skill honed by both ‘useful’ and ‘apparently useless’ study—to complex, real-world problems.

论证亮点： 提出超越对立的综合观点（dichotomy... is overly simplistic）。通过具体学科交叉例子（engineering 与 ethics）使建议非常切实可行。将讨论提升到培养 adaptable individuals 和 critical thinking 的高度。

Conclusion (结论段)
In conclusion, while practical considerations are undeniable in an increasingly competitive world, the intellectual vitality born of personal interest should not be sacrificed. A forward-looking university curriculum would therefore strategically integrate core professional skills with opportunities for elective exploration, thereby producing graduates who are both employable and intellectually engaged.

精要： 总结双方，重申个人综合立场，并展望理想方案（strategically integrate...），与引言段完美呼应。

从“读懂”到“会用”：你的三步精练法
解构与模仿（Deconstruct & Imitate）

任务： 仅阅读引言和结论段。

练习： 模仿其句式，为以下题目撰写开头和结尾：
题目：Some think that money is the key to happiness. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

模仿要点： 使用 While... 句型呈现双方观点；在末句明确给出你的平衡观点。

论证拓展练习（Develop Arguments）

任务： 聚焦主体段1和2。

练习： 选择上述“金钱与幸福”题目的一方观点，按照“主题句 → 解释原因 → 举例/假设 → 小结”的完整链条，写一个段落。

进阶挑战： 尝试在段落中使用 For instance, Therefore, Without... 等连接和论证手段。

词汇与句式激活（Activate Language）

从范文中提炼核心语料：

话题词汇： pragmatic career preparation, utilitarian approach, intrinsic motivation, prescribed career path, employability, critical thinking.

高分句型：

A dichotomy between... is overly simplistic.

...equip graduates with skills directly relevant to...

The goal should be to cultivate individuals who can...

你的任务： 任选3个上述词汇或句型，围绕“教育”话题，自己创造3个新的句子。

真题范文高效使用清单
请不要被动阅读范文。下次拿到任何一篇真题范文，请手持此清单，完成勾选：

1. 结构地图： 我能否用一句话概括每个段落的功能？（如：BP1: 讨论个人兴趣的重要性）

2. 论证工具箱： 作者在每段用了哪些论证方法？（举例、对比、解释原因、假设后果）

3. 路标词识别： 我是否划出了所有衔接词（Conversely, Therefore, Ultimately）并理解了其逻辑关系？

4. 语料挖掘： 我是否收集了5个值得模仿的话题相关词组和2个万能句型？

5. 观点迁移： 这篇范文中的论点，能否被我用在其他题目中？（如：本文关于“批判性思维”的论点可用于“科技利弊”、“媒体影响”等题目）

最终建议：
将剑桥真题后的考官范文（Examiner‘s Model Answer） 作为最高标准。反复精读同一篇范文的效果，远好于泛读十篇。通过以上方法，您将逐步构建起自己的高分写作体系，实现从“读懂范文”到“创造高分文章”的质变。如需对特定题型或更多真题范文进行解析，您可以随时提出。