? 雅思环境类高分范文示例
题目: Some people believe that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that individuals cannot solve these problems unless governments and large companies take action. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
范文:
It is widely acknowledged that environmental degradation poses a grave threat to humanity. While some argue that the scale of such issues renders individual efforts insignificant, others contend that systemic change from governments and corporations is the prerequisite for effective solutions. This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that a synergistic approach is essential.
On the one hand, the pessimism towards individual action is understandable. The magnitude of challenges like climate change or ocean plastic pollution is so vast that isolated personal choices, such as recycling or reducing water usage, appear to be a drop in the ocean. The real drivers of environmental damage are often industrial pollution set by corporate policies and national energy strategies dictated by governments. For instance, a single coal-fired power plant or a multinational corporation’s supply chain has a carbon footprint that dwarfs the lifetime output of thousands of citizens. Therefore, without binding international agreements like the Paris Accord and stringent regulations that force industries to adopt clean technologies, the impact of grassroots efforts may remain limited.
On the other hand, to dismiss the role of individuals entirely is short-sighted. Collective consumer pressure and shifts in public opinion are powerful catalysts for institutional change. When masses of individuals choose sustainable products, boycott companies with poor environmental records, and vote for green policies, they create an economic and political imperative for businesses and governments to act. The global movement towards banning single-use plastics, initially driven by citizen awareness and consumer choice, which later translated into municipal and national laws, serves as a compelling example. Thus, individuals form the social foundation without which top-down policies might lack support and enforcement.
In my view, framing this as a dichotomy is counterproductive. The most viable path forward lies in the interaction between individual responsibility and institutional power. Governments must lead by enacting and enforcing progressive environmental legislation and investing in green infrastructure. Simultaneously, individuals must fulfill their role as conscientious citizens and consumers, holding both corporations and politicians accountable. Only through this combined and sustained effort can we hope to mitigate the environmental crises we face.
(Word count: 322)
? 范文深度解析与学习要点
这篇范文展示了如何组织一篇高分讨论双方观点类(Discuss both views)文章。以下是它的核心得分点,你可以重点学习:
清晰有力的结构
引言段:清晰改写题目,并明确给出文章走向。
主体段1:讨论一方观点(个人力量有限),包含主题句、论证和具体例证。
主体段2:讨论另一方观点(个人力量是基础),同样遵循“观点-论证-例证”结构。
结论段:明确提出自己的立场(协同合作),并总结核心论点,没有引入新信息。
地道的词汇与搭配
环境问题表述:environmental degradation, climate change, ocean plastic pollution, carbon footprint.
解决方案表述:binding international agreements, stringent regulations, clean technologies, sustainable products, green infrastructure, progressive environmental legislation.
高分逻辑短语:a drop in the ocean, catalysts for institutional change, top-down policies, a synergistic approach, framing this as a dichotomy.
严谨的逻辑与论证
使用 “while”, “therefore”, “thus”, “for instance” 等词紧密连接句子,体现思维的连贯性。
每个主要论点后都跟有具体的解释或例证,避免空泛陈述。
?️ 如何自主寻找并利用更多优质范文
要持续进步,你需要学会自己找到并分析高质量范文:
黄金标准:精读《剑桥雅思真题集》(剑15-18)中附带的官方范文及考官评语。这是理解评分标准唯一最可靠的途径。
权威来源:访问雅思官网(IELTS.org)、British Council的备考板块,获取官方发布的写作示例。
高效学习方法:
不要背范文,要拆解范文:像上面解析那样,分析文章结构、论证方法和词汇使用。
对比与仿写:找一道题目,自己先写,再对比高分范文,找出差距。
建立语料库:将范文中的优秀短语、句型和论点按话题分类整理。
? 环境类话题核心词汇补充
除了范文中的词汇,你可以有意识地运用这些表达来丰富你的文章:
问题类:deforestation(森林砍伐), loss of biodiversity(生物多样性丧失), greenhouse gas emissions(温室气体排放), resource depletion(资源枯竭)。
措施类:promote renewable energy(推广可再生能源), impose a carbon tax(征收碳税), raise public awareness(提高公众意识), adopt a circular economy(采用循环经济)。
如果你能提供一道具体的环境类作文题目,或者想了解如何将某个观点论证得更深入,我可以为你提供更具针对性的思路分析和段落练习。