雅思写作真题思路解析及高分范文

雅思写作真题示例及类型分析

真题示例

Some people believe that universities should only offer subjects that are useful for future careers. Others think that universities should offer a wide range of subjects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

类型分析

这是一道典型的双边讨论类题目，要求考生对两种不同观点进行讨论，并阐述自己的看法。双边讨论题在雅思写作中较为常见，旨在考查考生全面分析问题、从不同角度思考观点以及清晰连贯表达自己立场的能力。

思路解析

支持 “大学应只提供对未来职业有用的科目” 的观点

1. 提升就业竞争力：学生学习与职业紧密相关的科目，能够更专注于特定领域的知识和技能，毕业后在就业市场中更有针对性，更容易满足雇主的需求，从而增加就业机会。例如，学习计算机编程专业的学生专注于编程技能训练，在软件行业就业时具有明显优势。
2. 节省时间和资源：集中精力学习实用科目可以避免学习一些对职业发展无直接帮助的课程，节省时间和学校资源，使学生能够在更短的时间内完成学业，并投入到工作中。

支持 “大学应提供广泛学科” 的观点

1. 培养全面发展的人才：广泛的学科可以拓宽学生的视野，培养全方位的思维方式和多种技能。不同学科之间的相互渗透和融合有助于激发创造力和创新思维。例如，学习工程专业的学生同时了解人文社科知识，能够更好地理解产品设计中的人性化需求。
2. 满足个人兴趣和潜力发掘：每个学生的兴趣和潜力都有所不同，提供广泛学科让学生有更多机会接触不同领域，发现自己真正感兴趣的方向，充分发挥个人潜力。比如，学生在尝试艺术和科学课程后，可能找到自己隐藏的天赋和热情所在。

个人观点阐述

在表达个人观点时，要清晰说明为什么支持某一方，或者是否认为需要一种折中的方案。例如可以认为在注重实用课程的基础上，增加一些跨学科选修课程，既满足职业需求，又能培养学生的综合素质。阐述理由时要合理且具体，确保逻辑连贯。

高分范文展示

题目回应段

In today's competitive job market, the debate about whether universities should focus on job - relevant subjects or offer a diverse range of courses has sparked significant discussion. Both sides of the argument hold valid points, and in this essay, I will explore both views before presenting my own stance.

支持 “只提供对未来职业有用科目” 论述段

Those who advocate for universities to only offer subjects useful for future careers highlight several compelling reasons. Firstly, this approach can greatly enhance students' employability. By concentrating on specific vocational skills and knowledge, students are more likely to meet the precise requirements of potential employers upon graduation. For instance, students majoring in accounting will have in - depth knowledge of financial reporting and auditing, making them highly sought - after in the financial industry. Additionally, it can save both time and resources. Students can graduate more quickly and start their professional lives earlier, while universities can allocate their limited resources more efficiently.

支持 “提供广泛学科” 论述段

On the other hand, proponents of offering a wide range of subjects emphasize the importance of cultivating well - rounded individuals. Diverse courses can expose students to different fields of knowledge, fostering creativity and innovative thinking through the interaction of various disciplines. For example, an engineering student with a background in art history may bring unique design concepts to his work, making his projects more appealing and marketable. Moreover, a broad curriculum allows students to explore their interests and discover their hidden talents. It provides a platform for them to experiment with different subjects and eventually find their true passions, which may deviate from the traditional career - oriented paths.

个人观点论述段

In my opinion, a balanced approach is the most desirable. While it is crucial to equip students with practical skills for the job market, universities should also offer a selection of liberal arts and interdisciplinary courses. This way, students can not only gain the necessary professional knowledge but also develop a broad perspective and transferable skills. These additional courses can enrich students' learning experience and contribute to their personal growth and well - being.

结论段

In conclusion, although the idea of focusing solely on job - relevant subjects has its merits in terms of employability and resource utilization, offering a wide range of courses is equally important for the holistic development of students. Striking a balance between the two can ensure that university education prepares students not only for their future careers but also for life in general.

语法与词汇亮点分析

语法亮点

1. 复杂句式运用：文中如 “By concentrating on specific vocational skills and knowledge, students are more likely to meet the precise requirements of potential employers upon graduation.” 使用了 “by + doing” 结构引导方式状语，使句子表达更加紧凑和清晰。另外，在阐述观点时，“While it is crucial to equip students with practical skills for the job market, universities should also offer a selection of liberal arts and interdisciplinary courses.” 运用了 “while” 引导的让步状语从句，体现了逻辑上的转折和对比。
2. 从句嵌套：“Those who advocate for universities to only offer subjects useful for future careers highlight several compelling reasons.” 中 “who advocate for...” 为定语从句，修饰先行词 “those”，准确地限定了持有某种观点的人群，展示了句子结构的复杂性和准确性。

词汇亮点

1. 丰富的同义词替换：“employability” 替换了 “ability to get a job”；“well - rounded” 代替了 “全面发展的”，使词汇表达多样。
2. 学术词汇运用：使用了如 “advocate”“compelling”“interdisciplinary”“holistic” 等一系列学术词汇，提升了文章的专业性和学术性。

结构与逻辑分析

结构清晰

文章采用了典型的引言、论述、结论结构。引言部分提出话题，引出要讨论的两种观点；中间通过两个段落分别论述支持 “只提供实用科目” 和 “提供广泛科目” 的理由；然后在个人观点段提出折中的看法并阐述原因；最后在结论段总结观点，强调平衡两者的重要性。

逻辑连贯

文章使用了众多的衔接词和过渡句，如 “firstly”“secondly”“on the other hand”“in my opinion”“moreover”“additionally”“for instance”“although” 等，使文章的逻辑关系清晰，论述层次分明，读者能够轻松跟上作者的思路。

常见问题解答

问题 1：写双边讨论题时，需要把两种观点都写得一样详细吗？

答：不一定。重点在于清晰地呈现两种观点，并合理阐述自己的立场。可以根据自己的论述角度和重点对两种观点的阐述详略进行调整，如果重点支持某一方，对这一方的论述可以详细一些，但也不能忽略另一方的合理之处，要保持论述的平衡和全面。

问题 2：在写作中如何避免语法错误？

答：平时要加强语法知识学习，通过做练习题、分析例句来掌握各种语法结构的正确用法。写作练习后仔细检查句子结构、主谓一致、时态等常见容易出错的地方。可以请老师或英语水平较高的人帮忙批改，分析错误原因并总结规律，逐渐减少语法错误。

问题 3：觉得自己词汇量不够，怎样在写作中弥补？

答：尽量使用你确定准确无误的词汇。学会使用一些简单词汇的高级表达方式，例如用 “argue” 替换 “say” ，用 “a variety of” 替换 “many” 等。巧用连接词和短语增加文章逻辑性，如 “therefore”“however”“in addition” 等，使文章整体表达更流畅。另外，在日常学习中注重积累与写作话题相关的词汇，通过背诵范文等方式扩大词汇量。

问题 4：写作时间总是不够用怎么办？

答：平时进行限时写作练习，按照考试时间要求训练自己，提高写作速度。在考试时，快速构思文章框架，确定每段的主题和大致内容，避免在写作过程中思路中断反复修改。先完成初稿后，如果还有时间再进行检查和优化，确保文章完整性和可读性。

问题 5：如何让自己的作文观点更新颖独特？

答：关注时事热点和不同领域的知识，拓宽视野，这有助于在分析题目时产生独特视角。可以通过阅读英文报纸、杂志、学术文献等了解多样的观点和意见。同时，在思考观点时，尝试从不同角度深入分析问题，挖掘潜在的逻辑关系和影响因素，但也要确保观点合理、能够自圆其说。

问题 6：写作结尾可以只重复自己的观点吗？

答：结尾单纯重复观点会显得比较单薄。除了重述核心观点外，最好适当升华主题，如可以从更宏观的角度展望所讨论问题的影响或发展方向，也可以提出建议、强调某个措施的重要性等，使结尾更加丰富且有力，给读者留下更深刻的印象。

结论

雅思写作需要考生在平时多练习、多积累，通过对真题的深入分析，掌握不同题型的解题思路和写作技巧。同时，注重语法正确、词汇丰富、结构合理和逻辑连贯，逐步提升写作能力。面对常见问题，要积极思考解决办法，不断改进写作方法，努力向高分迈进。希望通过对本题目的思路解析和高分范文的学习，考生能够在雅思写作中取得更好的成绩。