GRE写作Issue部分精品素材分享之苏格拉底的公正性

想要在GRE作文部分的考试中写出优秀的文章，论据素材是重要的一环。好的论据不仅能帮助你支撑观点，加强说服力，还能体现出考生在阅读量上的积累和深厚扎实的语言功底基础。特别是ISSUE作文，更是需要大量好素材作为储备，才能保证考生无论遭遇那种题目，都能游刃有余地完成一篇高分作文的写作。小编为大家整理了GRE ISSUE作文各类题目的精品优质素材，一起来看吧。

如何判断法律的公正性

There is no doubt that laws are made for a reason and the laws of a society reflect the values of that society because of tradition, necessity, and expectation. But occasionally there will be a law, which is unjust and wrong though not for everyone but say, for a group of people. If the law contradicts their high morals or religion, it is right for them to protest against it in a reasonable way. So now the question is what is that reasonable way and how to protest against an unjust law? First people have to ask themselves if there is a higher purpose, which make them to disobey it. They should look beyond the intent of the law and immediate results to see what the final result will be. It is not right to disobey an unjust law for just personal convenience. People should look at the alternatives, weigh them against what their personal beliefs may be, and then make a judgment based on their individual moral values.

苏格拉底观点： 公正

Socrates has his work cut out for him as how to promote justice as a way of life. The basis of his argument is the most persuasive part, and is that justice is needed to hold society together. He uses many examples of professions to prove that in a business sense： people do what they are best at, not what they will benefit most from. This gives way to the point that people do what is in the best interest to society, and that which benefits others most.

苏格拉底观点： 公正是人们互相作用的基础

Socrates explains that people need justice to interact even in the most basic society. Socrates believed that justice functions unknowingly, both selfishly so that people can benefit from the talents of others, and unselfishly trying share their skill with others. Despite many solid arguments, Socrates, main function in the book is not to preach justice, yet it is to question why the majority believes so strongly in injustice. Although the odds are stacked against justice with three men arguing against it, Socrates continually finds ways to raise some doubt about injustice as a way of life. He is able to successfully refute Thrasymachus’s arguments of might makes right and that unjust men are good and sensible compared to their opposite. He does by first showing that people in general, including the ruling class don’t always know what is in their best interest. Therefore, no matter who is in power, it is not always right to follow what they say. Secondly, he crushes the weak interpretation of the unjust man by showing that it is bad to compete with your equal, and proving that an unjust man always wants to get the best of everyone, whereas the just man is satisfied with equality.

Due to strong arguments from all three skeptics about the benefits of injustice, as opposed to the almost nonexistent downfalls, there is no other way to go. Socrates goes on to illustrate society, and rule by a group of completely just and educated guardians in later books. However, it seems that without popular belief in justice as the only way of life, injustice will always prevail.

In conclusion, factoring in modern religion and its threats of injustice leading to eternal damnation, the debate over justice versus injustice can never be completely resolved.