2021年3月7日GRE逻辑预测汇总归纳 点亮你的逻辑思维技能

小站教育2021-03-01 13:35:26

2964
问题相似?试试立即获取解答吧~
摘要:GRE逻辑题对思维能力有较高要求,常会干扰一些考生的解题思路影响解题效率和正确率,因此提前理顺逻辑思路能够很有效地帮助大家提升解题速度。本文将为大家分享2021年3月7日GRE逻辑预测,一起来看。

2021年3月7日场次GRE逻辑阅读预测发布,本篇预测包含对3月7日GRE阅读中逻辑阅读题目的内容盘点以及逻辑链分析,帮助大家理顺思路做好逻辑烧脑难题,一起来看!

2021年3月7日GRE预测其他题型预测:作文/短阅读/长阅读/填空/等价/数学 请走这里

逻辑阅读

Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for catering establishments are more stringent than those for ordinary restaurants, more of the cases of food poisoning reported to the city health department were brought on by banquets served by catering services than were brought on by restaurant meals.

Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?

A. A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period.

B. Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning.

C. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals.

D. The number of reported food-poisoning cases at catered banquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer’s or the client’s premises.

E. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another.

正确答案:E

题目解析:

逻辑:食物中毒-->宴席被报告

假设:食物中毒一定会被报告(无论是在餐厅还是在宴席上)

原文漏洞:尽管宴席上的食物比普通餐厅的食物经过了更严格的检查,但宴席上被报告出食物中毒的案例却多于餐厅的。

解题思路:假设取反(一切可以推翻假设的方式都可以)

E选项:给出了人们在普通餐厅吃饭中毒却不一定报告的情况,而在宴席上因为有认识的同伴一起进食从而可以确定是在宴席上中毒了。这是食物中毒一定会被举报的一种反例。

除了逻辑阅读预测,还有短阅读预测精彩内容 点击查看

下载小站GRE APP,刷GRE真题

本文来自于小站教育【GRE资料】专栏,转载请以超链接形式标注本文出处,并附上此申明,否则将追究法律责任。

看完仍有疑问?想要更详细解答?

相关推荐